A phrase I hope never to hear again: "The science is settled." Look, mate, if I apply the scientific method to that statement, then I come to the conclusion that it's full of shit. I've already stated here that the Earth may be warming, it may be cooling. I don't know. But I am fairly certain that anthropogenic "climate change" is a snake oil routine designed principally to separate me from my a) money and b) freedoms.
"But thousands of scientists have agreed," you counter. Yes, and not so long ago, "everyone" agreed that God made this world in seven days. It was all written down, you see? Right there in the Bible.
I don't expect the followers of the Religion of Climate Change to recant. I'm not expecting a Mass apology or even a card saying "oops." But in my dreamy dream world, I'd love to have them (hell, even one person) say something like "While I do believe that global warming is happening, and that it's anthropogenic in origin, I am going to continue to collect data and make public that data, because warming or no warming, that's science. In the end, the evidence may not support my thesis."
[crickets]
Over at PJTV there's a clip of 2 skeptics interviewing members of the Sierra Club, Greenpeace and the Center for American Progress about "Climategate." That's all well and good, but there's a bit from the CAP fella (if I recall properly) where he says that the scientists needed to let the public know that global warming was happening. I was thrown for a loop (okay, a small loop... a loopette) by that because I didn't think that scientists needed to get on a box and 'tell the world': rather that they'd make available their data and research and then let anyone who wanted to have a look at it and try to replicate the results. Let politicians and other bloviating types try to spread the news.
I don't know. At this point, I give more credibility to Vince (ShamWow, Slap-Chop). At least he knows he's selling me something, and we both understand the essence of the transaction.
1 day ago





